Showing posts with label PERFORMANCE. Show all posts
Showing posts with label PERFORMANCE. Show all posts

Friday, December 13, 2013

Morgan Higby-Flowers


"My interests circulate around particular spectrums in newmedia art, specifically work that incorporates discarded technologies. My sensibility tends to pursues encounters with wonderment & visual representations of new deformations." - Morgan Higby-Flowers. See more;


2013-08-13 at PM 03.49.33, 2013




PixelJAM2013_mrgn_hgby-flwrs, 2013



output [of] no-input system studio performance (long), 2010



notha, 2010



Movie 5, 2010


thanks for the tip, Chris Shier

Tuesday, August 13, 2013

Paul Prudence



Apeiron and Cyclotone are some beautiful live A-V works created by Paul Prudence using different algorithmic strategies, check out more interesting generative pieces on his site. See more;


Apeiron [fragments], 2013
"Apeiron explores the phase transitions and shape transmutations of a set of complex nested spherical harmonic forms modulated by sound. The apeiron, central to the cosmological theory created by Anaximander in the 6th century BC, means limitless, infinite, or indefinite. Anaximander believed that infinite worlds are generated from apeiron and then are destroyed there according to the principle of genesis-decay." - Paul Prudence.






Cyclotone [intro], 2012
http://www.paulprudence.com/?p=337

"Cyclotone cross-wires sound and video material to create multi-modalities using a variety of algorithmic strategies, further synergies are created by employing associative, metaphorical and perceptual bindings between the visual and sonic domains. The work takes conceptual cues from cyclotrons and particle accelerators and is inspired to commemorate the first wave of Russian cosmonauts who conquered space physically as well as the artists of the Constructivist movement who conquered space conceptually." - Paul Prudence.



Monday, November 12, 2012

Lumisokea & Legoman



"Lumisokea is a Belgian-Italian duo, formed by Koenraad Ecker and Andrea Taeggi. Their music is at once highly physical and rich in texture, using both acoustic (cello, prepared piano) as well as (analog) electronic instruments to create a dark and introspective listening experience. Their influences range from dub to noise, bassmusic, techno, musique concrète and contemporary classical music, while remaining focused on the key elements in their music : to induce trance-like states, to move bodies and to emphasize the tactile qualities of sound.

To strengthen the impact and concentration of their live-shows, Lumisokea has created a visual side to their musical performances together with Yannick Jacquet (Legoman), a well-respected video-artist, known a.o. from his work as a founding member of the antiVJ visual label." - imal.org. See more;


"The visuals and scenography that Yannick Jacquet designed for Lumisokea are based around the simple but highly effective idea of projecting slowly developing, abstract geometrical beams of light into a pitch black room filled with smoke. In contrast to most visuals used at musical performances, these moving shapes do not seek to add a certain meaning or concrete imagery to Lumisokeaʼs music. They rather function as a hypnotic focal point and a way to relieve the audience from the boundaries of the performance space, made possible through the use of the tactile and illusory qualities of light projected onto smoke." - imal.org

In fall 2012 Lumisokea will release their second album on Eat Concrete, entitled "Selva", following their well-received debut album "Automatons" (2011).



Tuesday, October 23, 2012

Jason Lescalleet


Photo by wfw

"Jason Lescalleet uses reel-to-reel tape decks to explore the textures of low fidelity analog sounds and the natural phenomena of old tape and obsolete technology. He is one of a growing list of master producer/musicians, whose skill lies as much in reworking, assembling and mastering the material available as in creating it in the first place. He has worked with such wide-ranging artists as Ron Lessard, Joe Colley and Phill Niblock, and has released a string of superb solo discs in Mattresslessness (CUT), Electronic Music (rrr) and The Pilgrim (Glistening Examples)." See more;

Forlorn Green by Jason Lescalleet/ Greg Kelley, 2000



Jason Lescalleet at TEMPLE, Jamaica Plain, MA in October 2010.

Friday, July 27, 2012

SHEROES - Dialogue between Rea, Lorna & Andrew



We continue our post series on SHEROES, the monthly Toronto art event series that began in July 2011 and has curated on and offline works that playfully and performatively explore the iconography and fan culture surrounding the “League of Legendary Ladies.”
In the first part of our series, we published an essay by David Balzer called “Is She a Snob?, an account of the series and its “vortex of gleeful, deconstructing snobbery”. Forthcoming will be interviews with some of participating artists in Virtual Season. 
In our second part, we have below a condensed and edited email dialogue between Sheroes founder Rea McNamara, GIF art curator/participating artist Lorna Mills , and participating artist Andrew Benson. See more;

I. On “Mythic Woman Power” 

ANDREW BENSON (AB): I feel as an artist involved with Sheroes for some time that it is something that always revealing itself in new ways, like its defiance of easy classification leads me to constantly develop my own perceptions of it. The "snob" stuff is good to consider, but I have to say that I see it in a totally different view.
Do either of you want to talk about how Sheroes itself is experienced from different angles and through different media and how that relates back to this whole thing about fandom being a collaboration with the celebrity that ultimately creates our understanding of the celebrity?

LORNA MILLS (LM): Looking at Sheroes from different angles is pertinent, because at the beginning I told Rea that we shouldn't document the events so much as mythologize them. (A photographer told me once that mythologizing artwork was what you did when you documented it.) 

REA MCNAMARA (RM): I do like that “fuckyeahsheroes” was often very “fuckyeahlornamills”. 
And even though "herstory" & "sheroes" & "mythic woman power" makes her cringe, she’ll still talk your ear off about a Virago Modern Classic

LM: Yes, “fuckyeahlornamills” worked out quite nicely for me. (And the dear Victorian and Edwardian Hens, who wrote all the novels reprinted by Virago Press, would never have used those goddessy terms.) 

But now you’ve touch upon my snobbery by taunting me with campy 70's feminist-speak. 
RM: Andrew and I actually had a gchat about that "herstory" playfulness. I had related to him the number of times I'd been asked if Sheroes was an "all-woman" effort; he talked about how we'd managed to avoid the "sticky and sometimes ugly gender-political stuff". 

LM: I kind of thought the presumption that all the Sheroes participants were female showed an amazing lack of imagination. 

The sticky and sometimes ugly gender-political stuff was avoided because no one wanted to participate in a mono-culture; with that in mind, cultivating a wide variety of artists and performers came naturally. 

But it wasn't just about gender. Other classifications were broken down in terms of identity. The GIF artists really were as international as I could find and the age & exhibition experience of the artists covered a wide range. 

Nothing is more pleasurable than to ignore a current artificial hierarchy.

RM: Lorna, I love that. "Current artificial hierarchy". The Sheroes Stan residency definitely came out of that. 

LM: As a whole, all the Sheroes events were queer-friendly, racially mixed and damn sexy. And considering the cultural mix of the city we are based in, how could they not be? 

That said, the project is also very much about gender without leaving out men or leaving out women. 

RM: The Toronto-ness is a meta layer. I always like bringing up Will Munro & Vazaleen

We've been lucky with Sheroes in being booked at venues that had a reputation for being inclusive queer-friendly spaces. (And straight up: the gays loved Sheroes before anyone else did!) 

I do think it's worth pointing out though that we still have issues around racially-mixed events happening in Toronto. While it's definitely a diverse city, do enough events happen where you see that intermingling, especially within the arts & culture community? I don't necessarily think so. Toronto Arts Council only implemented a cultural equity policy in the early 1990s, so there's a complicated history there in terms of representation and support for particular practices. 


LM: WTF? Are we not post-racial??????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? (Well, that amused me.) 

II. On Fandom 

RM: I think a lot about how the open space we created with Sheroes was akin to participatory online spaces like slash & fan fiction communities. 

Take the whole canon/fanon thing that's at the heart of many fandoms. A lot of the transformative works you'll find come from this process where seemingly individual, private yearnings for a canon (the original source material) produce these fannish works that, alongside other fannish works, create a better version of that favourite show/film/book/etc. This then created the "fanon" — the "fan canon" where fan-created facts are accepted as canon by the fandom. 

Does that make Sheroes a fandom? We brought together a seemingly disparate group, and presented them in such a way — with the pomp and pageantry of goddessy terms — that created a fannish-like narrative. 
AB: I like the relationship to fandom that you talk about, but I think one thing that is pretty interesting about Sheroes is that often you have artists with very little relationship with a celebrity's image or work contributing. It's sort of posing as the actions of fans, but really it's something else, or maybe it's positioned as fandom. 

There were a few Legendary Ladies that I wasn't that familiar with, TBH, like Dusty and to some extent Etta , so part of the assignment for me was the research that went into it. Even ones that I'm really a fan of (Yoko , Nina , Dolly ) I spend a lot of time researching on YouTube and Google image searches and Wikipedia.
LM: True, the fandom wasn't always genuine. There were a few legendary ladies that I couldn't have cared less about, but even if I was a fan, I still had to look for some sort of way my work could enter into the stream. That's why I was easy-going about submissions not being literal. I would have hated the project if everyone submitted portraits. 

RM: Madonna was a "difficult" Shero for me. Early on, a few of the Sheroes were chosen based on speculation around which Shero would bring the ppl out. (Apologies if this punctures any mythologizing efforts!) 

AB: I'm SHOCKED. But really, I suppose it's important to always remember that this thing wasn't just a conceptual feminist art project but also had to function as an event that people actually showed up to. Had to have a little appeal to the rest of the world. 

IV. On “Sexiness” (part I) 

RM: Why's the "sexiness" so important? What was it about that quality that drew in the GIF artists? How has the exhibition of the GIFs at Sheroes events been different from any other exhibitions? (Ie. BYOB , Speed Shows , etc.) 
LM: The sexiness is refreshing. Outside of some queer art practises in this city, anyway, there's still a lot of passive-aggressive minimalism with an exalted sense of its own importance, purity and rigor (plus the delusion that it’s original). I'd rather sleep on a bed of nails. Real BYOB events, where a bunch of young artists ACTUALLY bring their own projectors, can have the same sense of occasion as Sheroes, but obviously we are thematic and an integral part of something bigger. 

As for what draws in all the good GIF artists, I can't be sure. I was so surprised at how it snowballed from six or seven artists to 30. Treating it as an organized crew of artists rather than a different curated group show each month was easier for me. The excitement we generated for each other, each month, as we started to post our new GIFs was pretty infectious. 

AB: The relationship to other on/offline shows of internet artists is interesting. Many of these shows seem to me to function as an establishment of boundaries around a particular clique of Internet Artists. I guess this is what Lorna is referring to with her "current artificial hierarchy" comment. Sheroes might be just as cliquish (the Facebook group ?), but it seems like it's running on a different logic. 

LM: I was concerned about Sheroes GIF artists appearing cliquish. And that's a risk when you work with a regular crew. But I was always happy to hear from people who wanted to take part, especially if they came out of left field with great work I had never seen before. 

AB: I'm curious how strategic you guys were in who you invited to join in. Or was it just a friends of friends kinda thing? 

LM: Initially the invitations went out to artists that we were connected with on social media and who we thought might say yes. (That sort of thing is important, as we didn't want to deal with rejection). 

The only strategy I employed (that I'll admit to) is that this whole thing was a great opportunity to connect with artists I admired and to find out about younger artists who hadn't received much attention. The fact that almost everyone from the beginning wanted to continue contributing, shaped how this ended up being organized. 

AB: I like what you said about it being an excuse to meet and get to know some artists. I feel like the monthly rounds of contribution really got me acquainted with a bunch of really cool people, and had me paying more attention to people I was already aware of, because they would pull out some random thing that showed a whole other side of them or their methods. 

LM: My regret is that I'm now finding out about some more really good artists who would have loved to be involved. I wish I had known sooner. 

V. On “Sexiness” (part II) 

AB: To respond to Rea's earlier question about "sexiness" — I think it's hard to have an honest celebration/exhumation/invocation of female celebrities without dealing with the "sexy". 

I tend to think a lot about drag in relationship to Sheroes for whatever reason: the overt performance of absurd and at times disturbing sexiness, or some sort of mimicry of it. 

Dolly Parton, for that reason, was the ultimate Shero for me. 

LM: It’s all about drag and otherliness. 

RM: Drag and otherliness and Dolly were revelations. I felt like we were at a point where everyone was comfortable with the space that was created. The works by Manuel Fernández and Rollin Leonard in particular seem especially emblematic of that. I really enjoyed the work-in-progress jpegs folks shared. 

In fact, the “work in progress” tag was something I felt you actually kinda started, Andrew. 

AB: I guess maybe I did start the process screenshot thing, but that's sort of something I always just do now and then. I have this sort of superstition about my working process, where enough things have crashed or been accidentally deleted or hard drive busting where I often pull screenshots from whatever I'm working on. There's a really fleeting quality to a lot of things that I do, especially the more experimental video and programming stuff, so I have made a real discipline of constantly taking screenshots and doing recordings of whatever is happening in case that's the last I see of it. 

Anyways, that's how I started making GIFs in the first place, actually. 

RM: I really enjoyed the open process. It was like doing a residency, but instead of talking over breakfast or dinner the status of your written work or art piece, you'd see an image in the FB group or on G+. That kept me going with the documentation. I really enjoyed the generosity folks had with their artistic process, especially from the more established artists. 



AB: Sheroes really felt like a communal thing sometimes, and I was part of a conversation with other people struggling to meet their responsibilities. My favorite example was Rollin Leonard's painstaking struggle to do Dolly drag. It was obvious that someone had to do it, and felt like it was such a great morale thing to watch that take place. 

I work really hard on Sheroes things (partially because I'm procrastinating on other big scary projects and I'm a workaholic), but it's really cool that you can sense there are all these different levels of intensity that people treat Sheroes with, and it all has a place. The conversation around Youtube videos, process shots, and later on the Stan contributions really took it deeper for me. I liked that it felt like the conversation got started on G+ but then moved around to different online spaces (Tumblr, Facebook) and how the different spaces created different conversations. 

VI. On Being “An Event” 

AB: I sort of wish more art things functioned in these hybrid spaces. Are there any other ways where it being an (IRL) event created specific constraints? 



RM: There's an ease to the online aspect — the Tumblr, the interactions, screen shooting those interactions, capturing the process & work that occurred — that isn't there for IRL. It is an event that needs to be "sexy" the same way that the Shero has to be for their mainstream. Which is funny, because the IRL is the operating theatre that makes these performances, event GIFs, videos, etc. exist. It's the spectacle. 

That being said, the limitations and the hybrid space that was created definitely was the equivalent, of say, punk's three chords or that experience of being in an after-hours at 5 in the morning. When everything aligned — great performances, willing participants, good chunes, seizure-inducing GIFs, etc. — it was really magical. 

Monday, July 23, 2012

SHEROES - Is She a Snob? by David Balzer


Andrew Benson’s GIFs for Sheroes #9: Dolly Parton

Today we are proud to launch a post series about SHEROES and all movement around this monthly programming series which started just one year ago in July 2011 and which has been curating on and offline works that playfully and performatively explored the iconography and fan culture surrounding the League of Legendary Ladies.
Over the course of a year, the Toronto art event became a hub for a myriad of Canadian and international contemporary artists featuring frenetic assemblages of performance art, music, GIF and GIF-based video art, DIY projects, and various other activities.
Herstory has finally been done right. This week, SHEROES will celebrate the so-called batshit genius of its final inductee into the League of Legendary Ladies, Madame Nina Simone, on Thursday July 26th at the Beaver. Soon after, a culminating co-presentation of new and past works from the event series — Virtual Season — will take place in Toronto's Kensington Market on July 29's Pedestrian Sunday.

Taking the opportunity of the end of SHEROES, we start a little series of posts to know more about all these great shows and works exhibited. Starting today with an essay by David Balzer called "Is She a Snob?" (see it into the post), and the upcoming posts will bring an email dialogue between (founder) Rea McNamara,  (curator and participating artist) Lorna Mills and (participating artist) Andrew Benson. Also we will have several individually interviews from different participating artists involved in SHEROES!! See more;


Is She a Snob? by David Balzer, July 2012_

Let’s begin by talking about what Sheroes is not—or not just. Sheroes is not just a club night. Yes, it takes place in a club but also, vitally, online, and, at the risk of sounding whimsical, in the dreamworlds that both spaces cultivate. And so it is not just a party. And it is not just a celebration of women musicians and performers. It is also a celebration of their fans, and of culture-at-large. What it proclaims, enthusiastically, is that culture is made not only by its agents or even its most avid consumers, but also by the collaboration between them and, most intriguingly, by the ways in which that collaboration generates dialogue within its initial and, then, ever-evolving contexts. Accordingly, Sheroes is not just for women. As shown by its participants and attendees, who span ages, races, genders and sexualities, Sheroes is for everyone—everyone, that is, who understands what it means to induct a female pop superstar into “an ever-expanding ‘League of Legendary Ladies.’”

Rea McNamara founded Sheroes in 2011. As a close friend of hers, I can attest to its improvisatory evolution over the past year, as well as to its absolute dependence on collaboration, but can also say with confidence that it is a project only she could have created. The first Sheroes, celebrating Joni Mitchell, was on July 6, 2011, at the now-closed NACO Gallery, and was described on Facebook thusly: “A live chopped & screwed remix tribute to Joni Mitchell (AKA first lady of the canyon) via DJ reeraw (AKA Rea McNamara). Snobbery will abound—only focusing on samples & clips between For The Roses to Don Juan's Reckless Daughter.” Summative hashtags at the end of the description, which became standard for all forthcoming Sheroes events, read: “DO EXPECT: #helpfulhenrythehousewifesdelight”—Mitchell’s putative 1970s nickname for cocaine, found in the liner notes for her 1975 album The Hissing of Summer Lawns—“#adorothylamoursarong”—a lyric from “Dreamland” on Mitchell’s 1977 concept album Don Juan’s Reckless Daughter—“DON'T EXPECT: #trillysopranofolky #woodstock.”


Giselle Zatonyl’s GIF for Les post-Gendered et les autres group GIF show at Sheroes #10: Grace Jones

Here, then, is the seemingly unlikely germ for Sheroes: snobbery. Virginia Woolf privately presented a paper entitled “Am I a Snob?” to the Bloomsbury group at the Memoir Club in the 1930s, and her defiant, if tongue-in-cheek, answer to the titular question—a resounding yes—is, after a fashion, McNamara’s. In both women’s cases, this affirmative is about redefinition and rarefaction: indeed, about looking at culture from the outside in, or perhaps from the inside up. Sheroes was, from the start, concerned with paying tribute to undercurrents, obscurities and secret histories. There’s more to Joni Mitchell than Blue or “Big Yellow Taxi”; there is, for instance, that period McNamara used in her DJ set, Mitchell’s so-called difficult, jazz-inflected period of the 1970s, which, despite its infamy, is now seen as Mitchell’s major accomplishment by music critics. It also marked Mitchell’s breakthrough to African-American audiences, one of whom was a young Prince who, as Mitchell attests in a New York magazine piece (which McNamara duly posted on the event’s Facebook wall), used to send her fan mail “with all of the U’s and hearts that way that he writes. And the office took it as mail from the lunatic fringe and just tossed it!”

The snobbery of fandom, then—its paradoxical inclusiveness, or its strange, reverse-exclusionism—has become Sheroes’ mantra. As a teen, McNamara became deeply involved in online fan fiction, following and writing narratives (many “slash,” especially “real-person slash,” in which fans invent same-sex sexual scenarios between band members or celebrities) on the Beatles, the Strokes and *NSYNC. While studying at York University, McNamara was a guest lecturer on fan fiction for Marcus Boon’s Sampling and Contemporary Literature class, which led to her eventually being included in the acknowledgments of his 2010 Harvard University Press book, In Praise of Copying. Sheroes would not exist without both fan culture and its special iterations online. For the second, Chaka Khan edition of Sheroes (the party became a monthly at NACO; for its sixth iteration in January 2012, it moved to The Beaver on Queen Street West, where it currently resides) McNamara bought thigh-high black PVC boots in tribute to Khan’s outrageous funk accoutrements, and made a video in which she pranced around to the singer’s “Clouds” (a favourite of Paradise Garage DJ Larry Levan, one of the many guiding spirits for Sheroes). The point? According to her Facebook post, McNamara was “riffing on the classic YouTube private dancing genre.” She wasn’t just indulging in fandom; she was commenting on fandom while expressing her own fandom.


Se Ye (AKA Lavish Bat, our Grace Avatar) from Sheroes Grace Jones

This vortex of gleeful, deconstructing snobbery continued with the third Sheroes, which honoured Tina Turner, and generated another video in which McNamara and guest collaborator, performance-poet Naila Keleta-Mae —at this point, Sheroes was enlisting a variety of participants—danced like Turner to “Proud Mary” in McNamara’s living room, in emulation of moves from the Nintendo Wii game Just Dance 2. McNamara wore a wig, created by John Taccone of Navigate Salon and one of the many she would don for subsequent Sheroes, in tribute to “cosplay,” in which fans dress up, in real life, like their idols. At the event, McNamara took on the act aggressively, arguably disturbingly, adding to the wig a black eye applied by makeup artist Roxanne DeNobrega, in reference to Turner’s physical abuse under her ex-husband, Ike Turner. Tributes paid by Sheroes were clearly unorthodox; each event was becoming a kind of on- and offline operating theatre for its respective legend. The Tina Turner event’s “DON’T EXPECT” hashtag was, of course, “#ike.” For Yoko Ono, the fifth Shero, it was “#14yearoldbeatlesfans,” a reference to the droves of adolescent Beatles fans who continue to vilify Ono as “witch” and “bitch” on sundry online message boards. On the Facebook event page for Ono, one person wrote, “sorry, I really can’t stand Yoko Ono,” to which McNamara responded, near-inscrutably, “the kitchen door is the new front door. why do you choose to enter nutopia?” (Ono, by the way, is the only shero McNamara has made contact with, via a back-and-forth Twitter Q & A.)

The Tina Turner Sheroes also introduced animated GIFs: looped bitmap images that have existed since the early days of the Internet and have been revived on social-media sites like Tumblr as memes. Toronto-based GIF-artist Lorna Mills joined a handful of other creators, including McNamara, who looped Turner’s quivering lips as the Acid Queen in Ken Russell’s Tommy, and these GIFs soon became a bridge for Sheroes, both glittering party projections and online teasers—and, then, cheeky commemorations. Mills and colleague Sally McKay were formative in encouraging McNamara to emphasize Sheroes’ fan-ishness in the context of online outsider art. Mills has come to curate Sheroes’ GIF component, and its roster of GIF artists is now international, discussing and debating each shero via Google+. Mills gives a new, wink-wink-nudge-nudge title to this coterie every month: for “The Global GIF Aristocracy (von Sacher-Masoch Line),” a reference to Faithfull’s relation on her mother’s side to Venus in Furs author and masochism namesake, Leopold von Sacher-Masoch.


GIF by Grace McEvoy for Sheroes #6: Erykah Badu

In addition to GIFs, Sheroes’ online existence is predictably prolific, as illustrated by its frequently updated site, fuckyeahsheroes.tumblr.com, a mimicking of single-topic Tumblr fan sites with “fuckyeah” prefixes. All the performances at Sheroes are recorded and posted; photos abound. (In this manner, one doesn’t actually have to go to Sheroes to experience it.) A newer, entertaining feature of Sheroes has been its “Stan Residency Program,” for which a superfan works with Sheroes’ Facebook presence in the weeks leading up to the event, sharing tidbits and analyses around the woman-of-the-month.

But Sheroes’ IRL (in-real-life) existence, and indeed its classical affiliations, cannot be discounted. Álvaro Girón , who played with McNamara in the band T∆nG∆, should be credited with initiating the event: he was the one who invited McNamara to fill in for him at NACO that fateful July day, and is Sheroes’ on-and-off resident DJ. (Sheroes is most definitely pro-dancing.) Tony Halmos, a.k.a. Silk Degrees, not only introduces performers and karaoke-ers (Sheroes is most definitely pro-karaoke) but also designs the posters as well as trivia-filled trading cards for each shero, adding to the event shades of pre-internet fan culture. Halmos is also responsible for the coinage “League of Legendary Ladies,” which naturally recalls comics and their superheroes.


Sheroes at NACO

Sheroes’ pre-internet-isms go further. McNamara calls herself Sheroes’ “salonnière,” bringing to mind modernist figures like Gertrude Stein and Natalie Barney and the avant-garde movements they helped propagate. Sheroes’ latest project, Virtual Season , takes the concept full circle. An all-day, all-night outdoor and indoor extravaganza, co-presented by Whippersnapper Gallery, Virtual Season marks the end of Sheroes’ first run. Here, all of the Sheroes—Joni Mitchell, Chaka Khan, Tina Turner, Madonna, Yoko Ono, Erykah Badu, Etta James, Marianne Faithfull, Dolly Parton, Grace Jones, Dusty Springfield and Nina Simone—converge. The women are conjured by McNamara and various performers in a kind of séance of the dead and absent, recalling pagan and Christian festivals from Ancient Egypt and Greece to present-day Africa and Latin America. The worship is charged and cultish: snobbish, one might say. But it is also radically interpretive and fan-positive. Sheroes wants to liberate, and represents the liberation of, those who really get it.



Essay by David Balzer for the online publication Triangulation Blog - July 2012 
David Balzer is the author of the short-fiction collection Contrivances (Joyland/ECW Press). He has written about art and film for The Globe and Mail, The Believer, Modern Painters, PopMatters.com and others. He is currently working on a novel.



Friday, June 29, 2012

Grupa TOK performance 1973



A public art performance by Grupa TOK. It took place in Serbia in 1973. They were using protest signs with minimal patterns. See more;

See more pictures from this performance at Arhivaskc.



Tuesday, June 19, 2012

O (OMICRON) by AntiVJ



O (OMICRON) is the latest masterpiece of AntiVJ. They make me feel the perfection as they become amazing real architectures from the past century in virtual ones extremely calculated for their installations such as O (OMICRON) which take place at the historic building Hala Stulecia, an architecture by Max Berg (1913) in  Wroclaw, Poland.  This is a permanent installation directed by Romain Tardy & Thomas Vaquié. I took an interesting info from AntiVJ's blog, as they explain really nice everything about this project;

"Last year, we were approached to create our first permanent installation for the new museum of architecture of Hala Stulecia, in Wroclaw, Poland. The piece – that we called O (Omicron), is actually the last part of the visit, and a way to create a link between the rich history of the building and the present times, by turning this massive concrete structure into a lively architecture. When opened, Hala Stulecia was the largest reinforced concrete structure in the world. With a diameter of 65m it was home to the largest dome built since the Pantheon in Rome eighteen centuries earlier. The Centennial Hall was listed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site in 2006." - AntiVJ.  See more;

"It is reasonable to think that when Hala Stulecia was built in 1913 Max Berg’s ambition for his construction was to pass the test of time. What could have been his vision of the monument in the distant future? How did he imagine the olding of the materials? The evolution of the surrounding urbanism and populations?
The piece proposed for the Centennial Hall of Wroclaw is based around the notion of timelessness in architecture, and the idea of what future has meant throughout the 20th century.
Taking the 1910’s as a starting point (the dome was erected in 1913), historical and artistic references were used to reveal the architecture of the space, its timeless and, more surprisingly, very modern dimension."




"A deliberately minimalist visual aesthetic allowed to highlight the very architecture of Hala Stulecia’s dome and re-affirm its place at the core of the piece. Minimalism also appeared to be the most appropriate means of conveying this idea of future at different periods of time (from 20’s/30’s anticipation film to more contemporary productions ). But the use of these references was not simply formal: the vision of futuristic totalitarian societies seemed to echo back real moments in the history of the building, warning us against the dangers of an idealized vision of the future.

Inspiration for the music composed by Thomas for this project was found in both orchestral work, echoing the colossal size of the architecture, and electronic textures, evoking the action of time. The score also tried and recreate a sense of evolution of the materials used for the dome structure, and their sonic aging."

By using references such as Fritz Lang’s Metropolis or the utopian projects of Archigram to confront the different visions of the future at different times, we were interested in trying to create a vision of a future with no precise time reference. A timeless future."

> A project directed by Romain Tardy & Thomas Vaquié. Architecture by Max Berg (1913). Visuals by Romain Tardy, Guillaume Cottet. Music composed by Thomas Vaquié. 2D / 3D mapping by Joanie Lemercier, Romain Tardy. Management & production by Nicolas Boritch. Videos filmed by Jerome Monnot, Joanie Lemercier, Romain Tardy and edited by Jerome Monnot. AntiVJ

Making of



Tuesday, May 8, 2012

Victor Morales



Victor Morales performances with tridimensional environments usually using a game engine called Cryengine. His solo work consists of an exploration of video game engines as simulation environments, where death and physics are transformed into dramatic and comedic real time performance. 
Victor tells us more about his work; "I work with video game engines to make visual art. I usually show my visuals in live performances, generally in collaboration with other artists: musicians, dancers, actors and other visual artists. I like using this medium in performance because of its real time nature, I can trigger my images live, so it is a perfect tool for performance. I like to explore the surreal and psychedelic, and my process of making images is about the pursuit of "errors, glitches and wrongdoings" within these amazing pieces of software; in other words I try to "misuse" the software to find unexpected, unnatural and unique moving images. I generally use the Cryengine and it's Sanbox Editor, which in my opinion is the most powerful digital visual tool out there; sometimes I like to use the Source Engine and its developer tools combined with Garry's Mod. I like to modify these engines to get my own look and feel, and, whenever possible, i make original textures, models and write my own code." See more;


The first video below consists in a kind of "portfolio" where Victor Morales has mixed a lot of works he performed in real time. Here you can see an example about a performance Victor made with Hannes Strobl and Ulrike Sowodniok at Festspielhaus St. Pölten. Based on Schubert's Winterreise. And the last video here on the posts shows a full piece called "Vogelstimmen".





Vogelstimmen

"This is a piece "performed" along Messiaen's "en Sourire". It was performed with the TonKünstler Orchestra at the Festspielhaus in St Pölten, Austria on September 26, 2009. As you can see in the beginning I "attempted" to montage the visuals to the music, an idea that I abandoned towards the second part of the piece (after the fade out). I most say that this piece simply "intersects" the music, I am not looking for representation or marriage of media/meaning; I am just looking for intersections a la Venn's diagram. 
I used the cryengine 2 to make the 3d space/map. I performed it using quartz composer to control the montage in realtime and to add some effects. This version is NOT real time and it is missing most of the effects."



Wednesday, March 21, 2012

®NOVA · David Quiles Guilló · SPECIAL POST


David Quiles Guilló. photo by Giselle Galvão

®NOVA Festival is a multidimensional art festival, which brings to the forefront of the contemporary audiovisual  arts. The festival is a live construction site, which combines visual art, experimental, contemporary techniques, technological resources. The idea came from ROJO®, founded 11 years ago in Barcelona by David Quiles Guilló, director and curator of the exhibition, whose previous editions have been through São Paulo, Los Angeles and Rio de Janeiro. This year it is going to open in few days, just the next 6th April in Sao Paulo at MIS "Museu da Imagem e do Som"  supported by SESC Pompéia. It will feature the work of over 100 guest artists!

Triangulation Blog is supporting the ®NOVA Festival as online media partner and I really want to dedicate a post to this great event created because of the enthusiasm of David Quiles Guilló. Many of the artists participating on this festival have already been featured here,  I feel there is a really good connection with ®NOVA. For this Special Post we have an excellent interview made by Juliana D Chohfi to David, they both speak everything about and around the festival. Don't miss it! See more;

▼ Read the interview ▼


Juliana D Chohfi asks to David Quiles Guilló:

J:How did the ROJO start?
D:Rojo came out of a combination of factors. First one was my desire to have my own business. And just at that time I realized that young artists didn’t have many platforms to showcase their work. I had a communication agency and it didn’t take long for me to realize that this wasn’t really my area; I wanted to have an agency to work with these young artists. I was also upset because my clients wouldn’t take in ideas that wouldn’t go their way. So I dismissed all my staff, or my staff dismissed me (laughs). I said I was going to create a new platform and wasn’t sure how to maintain it and that the next three months no one would be paid. I was left alone with my idea of Rojo. And just there and then the project began. It started from a necessity that I spotted in the market and my needs, a reason to get in touch with all the people I admired.

J:It seems that ®NOVA is a ROJO that materialized in space and gained voice and soundtrack. Where did ®NOVA come from?
D:It aroused from a need to work less. When we thought of ®NOVA, in 2007, I was in Barcelona and we were making 20 monthly openings all over the world. At the same time we produced the magazine and did clients projects. Hectic times! And I thought: “What if I could get everything together in a single project and get paid a million dollars?” This was the first idea. The project was called The Wrong. The idea was a biennial where all the artists in it, were those who never made it to proper Biennials. It started well, but when I moved to Brazil the idea evolved into an event that happens several times a year, a big event to gather many artists. Graziela (Graziela Calfat, Executive Director of ®NOVA, married to David) came up with the name. ®NOVA means new, we thought it had everything to do with what we were thinking, a short name that would work with Rojo. And yes, you got it right. ®NOVA is everything we did before separately, now gathered in one event only. It has music shows, performance, communication, collaboration between artists that have never worked together before and it has brands involved in the project. Everyone thought it was madness in Spain; we came to Brazil and it worked here. Brazil is much more open. I’m getting to do what I wanted to and also work a little less. It is indeed too much work, but what changed is the intensity. Before all months were hectic, now only eight months of hard work for two hectic months (laughs).


Atsuhiro Ito

J:What has changed since the first edition of ®NOVA to the upcoming one?
D:Interesting. In fact we’re going backwards, which is good! The first ®NOVA was done here at MIS (Museum of Image and Sound in São Paulo) and this edition will also happen here. We’re going back to our roots. Back then we used to test new formulas. Artists were put together: an artist would paint a wall and another would paint over it, a big work in process. The music was left a bit behind. This changed in the following editions. I tried to mix everything and a bit more, music artists, video, we did an experiment with film; and suddenly we were going too far. It was getting difficult, not only to the public but to the artists as well. They came here not knowing what they would do and in the end they wouldn’t take in all the experience we had to offer. So we took a step back. This edition will have a mixture of different medias in the same space and music mixed with video but the artists will be free to do what they like, the way they like it but always among other artists. The change is mainly in the course of ®NOVA. We went far and came back with all this experience for the edition of 2012. The big difference is the experience we gained and the content. Today we bring more artists from all around the world that are even more innovative. The content is always changing and the medias too. It’s an evolution.

J:®NOVA’s format is completely innovative and different from what we see in multimedia exhibitions that pop up everywhere. Was it your intention to break the conventional format?
D:One of Rojo’s features is to create formats. Some of them are conventional such as the magazine, the website; and others not so conventional, such as art shows on the street. It’s more conventional nowadays but I started doing these shows a long time ago. But coming back to the question, I think the format is very important because the artist can’t feel his participating of another music festival or another group show. So we try to innovate in what we present and how we are going to present it. We ended up breaking some taboos. Back then you couldn’t put a type of artist next to another one that wouldn’t match, Street Art wouldn’t go with installation or High Art and music and performance. The idea was that all types of artists and all kinds of work could coexist in the same space for a period of time long enough so that the artists were able to work properly and that the public wouldn’t have that feeling that “if I don’t go to the exhibition now, I’m gonna miss it.” The format emerged from the desire of mixing everything we like, without caring much about what the market was going to say. The idea is to mix new artists with artists already known. Nothing was done to clash with someone’s idea, that’s not it, it’s all about what we want to do and believe it’s good not only for us, but for the artists. The artists have to take in all they can when they come to the event. If they were put with artists who they’re are used to working, it’s only another show, whereas if they work with artists they have never imagined working; then that’s an experience and you start to get the feel of ®NOVA. We are turning into a big family of people who become best partners, creating new bands, new projects and this is what we always wanted: to shake the art world a little.


Penique Productions

J:The project receives artists from all around the world, including Brazil. In general, how do you select the artists?
D:In general, we select… I say we select, but no (laughs), I select. There are some criteria. The first is to compensate people who have worked with me at some point of Rojo’s history and gave more than they received, people who did very much for Rojo and this is the time that I have to appreciate their work. This is a deeper reason. Not that everyone who worked with me before is part of ®NOVA, it has to fit in the project. The other criterion is to find artists that have no ‘fear’. Artists that I can easily get in touch with. Hardly ever you will find an artist in ®NOVA that came through an agent or gallery. I want to speak directly to the artist, there must be a relationship so that he understands what we will do here and the risk it assumes. I don’t want anyone in the middle of it evaluating whether this is good for his career. There is another criterion that is what I call complementary arts. I try to mix things that complement each other and try not to have artists working in the same aesthetic area at ®NOVA. I seek works that are very distant. My research goes pretty much this way. I want artists that always have something to add. I don’t fight for artists that have name, unless it’s an easygoing person. I’m looking for people artists. We are a family. I don’t have a selection committee, I have people that recommend artists, I have my sources of information, and I look for artists that I like. I select what I want; I am a despot, a dictator (laughs). Finally, the last criterion is that everything has to fit in, or not, let’s leave it this way… I think everything has to be a little disengaged. Our work is to put together all that wouldn’t normally go.

J:A memorable moment or show in ®NOVA?
D:Difficult question. We had five editions already. I remember Rio, last year’s opening night with Hildur Guðnadóttir and Quayola was very very nice. It was beautiful! We always have an idea of the result but we never know for sure. It was awesome! I mentioned this show because it’s still fresh in my mind. I think all the openings and closing nights are memorable. I enjoyed the opening of our first edition in LA. The music was really cool. We placed Computer Jay (who’s coming this year) with Cristopher Cichocki, two different worlds. Computer Jay produces cool soul jazz and Christopher makes noise without much sense; it was great. I really liked Protey Temen’s presentation at the Cinemateca last year. It ended up with everyone dancing. I don’t t know if it was alcohol or the craziness of his film (laughs), his presentation was really lysergic, he was speaking Russian, we couldn’t understand a thing. I thought it was the most radical of all. It was the closest to what I was looking for, something that you lose the sense of who was the public, of what was going on there. Overall, I think that the Sunday pizzas are memorable! That’s the time everyone is relaxed; people are either done with their work or are arriving at the project to get started. Everyone talks to each other, leaving behind that “don’t you know who I am” feeling. All the artists that come here have their individual world, they have a reputation, followers, and galleries; but when they get together with other artists, they drop this nonsense. That’s when partnerships and collaborations begin. This is the best time.

J:Experimentalism seems to be the watchword of the project.
D:No, I don’t think that experimentalism is the watchword. The word experimentalism pushes people away because they think we will create something that they won’t be able to understand. And that’s not our point. We want to bring together four different fields of art that are usually understood separately, to be acknowledged together. It’s not that I don’t like the word experimentalism. I do. The word festival, for example, has only appeared in this edition, I have resisted to this word for long now. It seems that festival is a three-day show with art and parties. What we do lasts longer and it’s bigger than that, but it feels like we are closer to it than nothing at all. Before this edition, the project was called ®NOVA Contemporary Culture. What does that mean? (laughs). I think experimentalism is not the watchword but the way we work. We experiment with pretty much everything.


Zimoun

J:What does ®NOVA mean to you?
D:®NOVA is my son. I feel that I am approaching the format I would like to work with all my life, I don’t get tired of making ®NOVA, although it’s very tiring. There’s a song by Hess is More that says ‘creation keeps the devil away’. It’s great and I really believe in it, if you’re working and doing things you enjoy, this ‘devil’ – that can be interpreted in a thousand ways – has no way of entering your life, there’s no room for it. There’s nothing that will stop my desire to keep doing something cool. I am very close to what I would like to do every day, meet artists, bring people together and do many, many cool things. I’m still approaching the correct format, but I’m close, very close.

J:The project has happened in LA as well. Do you feel the reception of the public is different from the one in Brazil? Does São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro influence the project?
D:The difference between São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro is more noticeable because we spent more time in both cities. Los Angeles happened only once and it was kind of a sample of what we wanted to do. We did only a week and a half of project and the result - the exhibition - was on for more thirty days. In LA, they don’t really care for the work in progress. They prefer something ready-made. Some medias even arrived before the opening but they didn’t take in the idea we were presenting. I guess that’s because it is a different concept and they are not used to it, nor the galleries are used to staying open while the artists are working. When it comes to São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, the difference is mainly the cost. São Paulo has a much greater cost to bring people to the event. I guess it’s because the city has a lot going on. Although it has more public, the cost is still higher. In Rio, we did one of the most difficult events ever. Here in São Paulo at the Cinemateca, we had a script, had a name, artists and had a trailer, while in Rio we just got some artists together and spread the word that there was going to be an experimental work. People actually came to see what was going on! In São Paulo this would never happen! I think Rio is more receptive, perhaps because it lacks such sort of gatherings and events. They are much more open to see what we do and have different opinions about it. Here (São Paulo) we got a unanimous vote saying that the project was cool. In Rio, there were some who felt the project was horrible and others that thought it was wonderful! To me, that’s something that adds up.

J:How did it feel to produce ®NOVA’s communication campaign? Many countries, few days…
D:That’s the first time someone asks me that. It was really cool! More than half of the people we were going to work with, we met for the first time. Usually the artists arrive at the event and we welcome them here. In this case was the opposite. We went to them and they welcomed us. So it was a really nice thing. I visited cities that I didn’t know, Stockholm, Dublin… doing things out of the computer is cool too! It was a way to get everyone out of the emails, computer and work together. That’s what excites me I think. In the logistics part, well there wasn’t enough time for leisure. Frank (Isaac Niemand) says: “Now that we know we can do it, we should never do it again!” No, not really. I’m already preparing the next campaign and it will be awesome.

J:What is the main concept behind the communications campaign of 2012?
D:We always suffered with the artist’s promotional images. They either didn’t have the proper settings or were images that had been published somewhere at least once. I thought it would be nice to have our own pictures. At the same time, we wanted the audience to recognize a unique image of ®NOVA. The first year when we brought the Fuck Buttons, the public thought that it was part of the museum’s program, that had no involvement with ®NOVA. This time we want to create an image that somehow unifies the event so we went after the artists to take their picture with this image. We got in touch with Koen (Koen Delaere). I ordered him one hundred works for the exhibition and ten of these works were turned into t-shirts. He created five unique t-shirts and customized other five. All t-shirts have a similar style, but are still different. And we expect the media to publish these photos and the public will identify the event because of these images. Without being explicit with a logo. Again, the form is to experiment, we are testing this and next year we will have an evolution of this idea, something even crazier, but I won’t tell you now (laughs).

J:How would you describe the ®NOVA generation?
D:Those friends that you would like to have forever! A generation of people that is open to the new and free from conventions and ego. People that show what they do and share how they do it, sharing their secrets. Is the kind of people that spend a week with others they don’t know and that’s all right. People that share a room with others they don’t know and that’s not a problem. Those friends you communicate via Internet and get together once a year and nothing has changed.


Graham Caldwell

J:®NOVA is really ‘new’. Did you find obstacles to establish the project?
D:I haven’t been lucky yet to make a project in which I didn’t find difficulties (laughs). I’m still waiting for this to happen. I’d love that! (laughs). I not only found holdbacks in developing concepts but in institutions and brands as well, it was hard to make them believe that what I was going to do would have a minimal repercussion. Because in the end, what they want is to have their institutions full of audience and brands that will reach their target audience. This is complex. We were fortunate enough to have the background of Rojo, clients like JB of Diageo, Nike, Pepe Jeans, Diesel, Smart, among others. We worked directly with the international marketing of some of these brands, not just for one project but for several years. This shows credibility, we had such luck.

J:Tell us about ATLAS, ®NOVA’s mini-series.
D:I’ll tell you why we got to a mini-series. We’ve been making videos of work in progress and making of for four editions now. So Frank (Isaac Niemand) and I decided to rethink this format. We wanted to make something cool that could have continuity. Something detached from the work in progress because we already have hours and hours of artists at work, we even have a proper film. We wanted to innovate and ended up with a mini-series format that everyone enjoys. The mini-series revolves around two protagonists, they are friends living together and working in KLM, the airline that supports ®NOVA. They are flight attendants who travel the world, speak several languages but almost never meet each other. Together they go through various situations that somehow interact with ®NOVA. Each chapter has three minutes. The first season has thirteen chapters, plus a pilot that we’re shooting today. I was very focused on the aesthetic part and I think it will end up as something very sentimental (laughs). The idea is that people who think they do not understand ®NOVA, will get closer to it through these characters, and perceive it as something available for them as well. That’s what we are seeking. We are super pretentious, always have been. And again, is not the word but the way. We are experimenting. For me it is only the first of many seasons.

J:Where do you find your inspiration?
D:Inspiration? Inspiration. Everything I guess. The city. São Paulo. It is a sunbeam, a downpour. Not that nature inspires me, but its visual part. And São Paulo is radical. Just a moment ago there was a thunderstorm and out came the sun, then back to a darkness and rain drops again. I think these contrasts inspire me.

J:What is your expectation for this year? And what can the public expect?
D:It’s like I was talking to one of the actresses just now… keep your expectations low and everything will work out. I’m not expecting much, everything will go wrong, and the artists won’t be able to cope with the space… (laughs) The music won’t be good (more laughter)… Expectations? I always have the best expectations! The public can expect a lot of cool people and artists from different places of the world, many of them are coming for the first time to Brazil and don’t know what they will find here, they don’t know the public nor their reactions. Expect a lot of different things from what is usually seen and don’t worry about being an art critic to appreciate what will happen there. We like to create sensations and magical moments. We like to make good, beautiful and affordable things. Expect great music of course! Much different and really good music. The tunes include neoclassical music by Nils Frahm and Bosques de mi mente. They are composers of a classical music that nearly turns into pop music. There’s Jay Jay Johanson, it’s been eleven years since he last came to Brazil, and he has great albums and will come with an amazing format. Another great attraction will be by Mouse on Mars that will bring a new show that is full of nonsense. There’s Gonjasufi that plays on that roots side. Wow! There’s a lot of great music! Esmerine is amazing and they play something like a post-rock with different instruments. Thiago Pethit is on the Brazilian team of great music, I really like him and he will open the event beside Beast who creates a lysergic Rock that has nothing to do with Pethit’s sound. I think it will be an incredible mix. I hope many people leave ®NOVA with their new favorite band. Another pretentious goal, I know (laughs).

Interview made by Juliana D Chohfi. Thank you!


For finishing this post there is an awesome inspiring 75min documentary film about NOVA, directed by Isaac Niemand.  It shows a previous edition of NOVA which happened in July and August 2010 at the same location, at MIS, so you can have an idea about how is going to be the upcoming festival. I also enjoyed to hear the artists participating speaking about their art and work.



This is happening, and starts in few days, the opening day, Friday April 6 to 12 pm, the exhibition will present over 50 gigs, will feature more than 100 national and international artists working in live. In the cultural spaces of São Paulo and Rio de Janeiro, artists are grouped in teams collaborating with each other. Thus, the exhibition will remain in constant motion and creation to the final week of the show, which will host the big closing party.
®NOVA for 55 days offer more than 80 hours of film, art and video art to generate a unique experience, pointing to the cultural diversity of contemporary art with the use of colors, lights, textures, music, design and collaborative artistic compositions.

Check some of the artists participating here.
Join ROJO on facebook here

David, thanks for creating all this!

6 April - 31 May 2012 / Sao Paulo & Rio de Janeiro / Brazil